WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Gary Peters, Ranking Member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, is raising concerns following multiple reports that the White House has misused high level national security computer systems in an effort to conceal the details of the President’s conversations with foreign leaders. Peters, who is a former Lieutenant Commander in the U.S. Navy Reserve and a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, is pressing for information on how the codeword-level system managed by the National Security Council (NSC) is being used to store presidential call records.
“The role of the National Security Council and of the classification process is to protect national security, not personal or political interests,” Senator Peters wrote. “An attempt to ‘lock down’ official documents using systems established solely for codeword-level intelligence information would be a misuse of critical national security systems and resources available to the White House.”
Peters’ request follows the disclosures in a whistleblower complaint and additional media reports that codeword-classified systems designed to protect American national security have been misused as a part of an effort to “lock down” presidential call records. According to the whistleblower complaint – and later confirmed by the White House – records of President Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky were not stored on a shared classified computer network, as is typical of calls between the President and foreign leaders, and were instead stored on a separate system typically reserved for highly sensitive classified information, including covert operations and national security material.
Additional media reports suggest this was not the only time a presidential call record was placed on the codeword-classified system, and that records of conversations between President Trump and President Vladimir Putin of Russia, the Saudi Royal family, and President Xi Jinping of China may have been stored there as well. Further reports also indicate that the White House has opened an “internal review” of the decision to store records of the call with President Zelensky on the codeword-classified system, although the scope, timeline, and independence of this review remain unclear.
Text of Peters’ letter to the White House Counsel is copied below, and available here. Peters also sent a similar letter to the National Archives and Records Administration, which is available here.
October 16, 2019
Mr. Pat Cipollone
White House Counsel
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. Cipollone:
On September 25, 2019, the White House released a memorandum roughly transcribing a July 25, 2019 call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During the course of this conversation, President Zelensky thanked President Trump for the aid and support provided by the United States to Ukraine, and President Trump asked that Ukraine investigate allegations involving a potential political rival in the 2020 Presidential election.
I am deeply alarmed by President Trump’s requests during this call and actions reportedly taken to suspend congressionally appropriated military and security aid for Ukraine approximately one week prior to this call. I am further troubled by allegations in a whistleblower complaint, released publicly on September 26, 2019, that the White House attempted to “lock down” records of President Trump’s July 25, 2019 call. This disclosure received a preliminary review from the Intelligence Community Inspector General (IG), who determined it appeared credible and met the definition of an “urgent concern.”
The whistleblower complaint alleges that a “word for word transcript” of the call was not stored on a computer system typically used for such records but instead moved to “a standalone computer system,” managed by the National Security Council Directorate for Intelligence Programs, that is “reserved for codeword-level intelligence information.” A senior White House official has since confirmed that the memorandum of the telephone conversation was stored on this more secure system. The whistleblower complaint states that this move was made at the direction of “White House lawyers,” and recent reporting indicates that this move may have been made at the direction of Deputy White House counsel John A. Eisenberg. The whistleblower complaint further states that, “[a]ccording to White House officials I spoke with, this was ‘not the first time’ under this Administration that a Presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive—rather than national security sensitive—information.”
The White House has since confirmed that the transcript of the call with President Zelensky was stored on this highly classified computer system. Subsequent reporting indicates that other phone calls—including conversations between the President and President Vladimir Putin of Russia, the Saudi Royal family, and President Xi Jinping of China—may have been stored there as well.
The role of the National Security Council and of the classification process is to protect national security, not personal or political interests. An attempt to “lock down” official documents using systems established solely for codeword-level intelligence information would be a misuse of critical national security systems and resources available to the White House. As stated in Executive Order 13526, which remains in effect under the current Administration, information should never be classified in order to “conceal violations of law, inefficiency, or administrative error” or “prevent embarrassment to a person, organization, or agency.”
In order to ensure that the American people have all the facts, and to determine whether the White House has complied with all relevant laws and policies pertaining to the classification and storage of the President’s official communications, please respond to the following no later than October 30, 2019:
Please send all unclassified material directly to the Committee. If any of the responsive documents contain classified information, please segregate all unclassified material, provide all unclassified information directly to the Committee, and provide a classified addendum to the Office of Senate Security.
I appreciate your prompt attention to this matter.
###